Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Now to add to that, I'm not against DLC's completely, but having it cost OVER $20 in Europe AFTER 5 YEARS is absolutely ridiculous. The least they can do is lower the price, because I'll be damned if they need that much money to add minute changes now and then. At best what they should do is not withhold essential feature behind a paywall. If there're enough fans that love the game for what it is, they can give money out of their appreciation for the devs by buying texture packs/less relevant DLC. Forcing everybody to do it just so they can have a bearable experience is as close to greed it gets.
Not update the game?
Release a new title every year so people have to pay £40 for the dlc worth of content instead?
Switch to a monthly subscription model?
Go Pay to Win?