Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
IGN (and specifically their employee Rebekah Valentine) published a hit piece against Game Science based on mistranslated material. Other outlets have since picked up the ball, echoing these same false allegations against the studio, only citing the faulty IGN article as their lone source. In other words, IGN is the fountainhead of the all libellous hit-pieces against the game and its devs.
As far as I've seen, IGN has made no attempt to issue a retraction of that article or apologise to the studio for making these false allegations. If they had, perhaps a person could give IGN the benefit of the doubt -- that they were reporting as best they could on faulty information -- but that they have failed to make any corrections after the translated material they based those accusations on has been debunked makes it seem that was their intention the whole time, to drag the developers name through the mud truth be damned.