Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
1: you started out the “game isn’t fun” section talking about graphical elements, which are indirectly related to fun at best.
2: you spoke about the ‘better player’ not winning 100% of the time as if that was not a feature inherent to the entire cardgame genre. In my opinion, card games having some randomness (not hearthstone-levels or what you describe artifact having, but rather the randomness that comes from drawing from your chosen deck at random) is a good thing. I like card games for the reason I don’t like chess and shooters very much anymore: card games are tense and exciting against any opponent with some ability to play the game competently. I find that in games that are almost entirely skill-based I get bored playing against much worse opponents and sometimes also frustrated playing against opponents far better than me.
I honestly want to know what kind of bullshit they were brewing while tf2 was drowning in bots and being heavily neglected
This project was lead by the creator of Magic I head. Did he sabotage the design of this game so as not to take from Magic the Gatherings profits? ;)
What else do you want?
Until Valve decides we're not permitted to use the trading service for specific items because they can turn a higher profit by restricting their exchange to the market where they can siphon a cut out of every transaction.