Thanks to everybody who commented on these things, as we tried to make clear we do listen and will always try to do what customers want. They pay our invoices after all! On VR: No, simply makes no sense for us. VR needs very potent hardware while the whole project was intended to be usable on very modest hardware. I do understand a user who loves the project would want it, but commercially it simply makes no sense. On TrackIR: Yes, we do understand a sizable amount of our customer would li...

Game crashes all the time need help before i request a refund as i would like to play

WHy does it lag so much... even i put very low graphics and resolution and it still lags I got a good pc GPU is gtx 1650 TI intel i5 10th gen 8 gb rams!!

crash report http://puu.sh/HKarf/44a9db28d3.xml

Mathijs Kok replied to one of my previous postings to VR, that according to market research, only 0.5 percent use track IR. I don't know if this is true, but I am sure that the number of people who use VR in flight simulation is much higher. All major flight simulators, whether MSFS, X-Plane, P3D, AeroFly FS2, DCS, Il-2 Sturmovik, Flyinside Flightsimulator and so on support VR. They all did no market research? For me therefore absolutely incomprehensible... And I also don't understand why the discussions...