Edit: I'm still playing isonoz, I just hope it upholds ww1 realism, or making it more gamefied.

The game doesn't know what it's doing. Verdun knew what it was doing, Tannenberg too, but this one? No.

Verdun, a game meant for fearing the battlefield, if not one of those trench maps

Tannenberg, a game meant for tactics, and equitable intelligence

Isonzo, a game meant for a realistic show of the italian front

The thing wrong with Isonzo is that it doesn't make players act what a ww1 soldier would act like. They never take mg positions(you'll die instantly), they're far less likely to want to do more tactical attacks, they're far less likely to follow officer orders(Though I get it sometimes, it's generally dumb tactics sometimes)

Isonzo isn't worth it at this point, the maps are far too aesthetic with meaning, it generally doesn't come with any important changes(except for those high ground maps).

Edit: I'm still playing isonoz, I just hope it upholds ww1 realism, or making it more gamefied. The game doesn't know what it's doing. Verdun knew what it was doing, Tannenberg too, but this one? No. Verdun, a game meant for fearing the battlefield, if not one of those trench maps Tannenberg, a game meant for tactics, and equitable intelligence Isonzo, a game meant for a realistic show of the italian front The thing wrong with Isonzo is that it doesn't make players act what a ww1 soldier would act like. They never take mg positions(you'll die instantly), they're far less likely to want to do more tactical attacks, they're far less likely to follow officer orders(Though I get it sometimes, it's generally dumb tactics sometimes) Isonzo isn't worth it at this point, the maps are far too aesthetic with meaning, it generally doesn't come with any important changes(except for those high ground maps).