~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Alexandria is burning-----------------------------------------
dancing between ways ..............................................................................................................................................
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ watch it

ǝʌǝɹʎʇɥᴉuƃ



























when learning a game, we progress through steps
step 1 (check)
step 2 (check)
etc...

and then, since it is a game and we want to have fun, we start mixing the steps.
we start experimenting, we start playing.
then we receive feedback, we learn, we categorize.
we try to find patterns of effectiveness.

step 3 -> step 5 -> step 1 -> step 6 = a win

etc.

or like the opening moves of chess:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5

the point is we start to revel in the mixing of these steps
in the outcomes they produce and the combinations
we take what we have learned and established and accept it as fact

we never revisit step 1

when in reality, we should sit in the space before step 1.
when we decided to start, and when the possibilities were infinite.
when we didn't categorize.

The space between the start and the learning of step 1 is infinitely deep

it is a game unto itself