You know, it is chauvinist men like you that make women so emotional. Maybe, just maybe, YOU are the one who is flawed. But you are too damned self-absorbed and gender discriminatory to ever think that there is some flaw in the sculptured image you have made yourself into. And maybe if you STOPPED using the opposite sex as nothing more than a figure, something to blame, something to mistreat, and something to abuse, you could stop making yourself into such a vexing sexist pig. And, maybe, if you could take a look outside of yourself and not give a name to a large group of peoples, you could learn something. Oh and also, have you taken sex ed? Because last time I checked,YOU would not BE here without a woman. And also, you are making YOURSELF look stupid and unenlightened to the human species when you even ask this question. So I'll answer your question with one of my own: Why are YOU so annoying?

Go fall in a ditch.

This kid is a blatant hacker. I believe he is hacking for the following reasons:

1. His bullets do more damage than mine!
2. I didn't know he was there and he shot me when I wasn't paying attention!
3. He always seems to not die when I am shooting at him I NEVER MISS because I am the greatest CS:GO player of all time!
4. He knifed me!
5. I lost the match and he caused me to derank!
6. I did better than him during warm-up, so he clearly toggled on mid-match!
7. His USP-S killed me in 1 shot despite me unloading my Glock in his general direction!

+rep very good at farming

Big Shaq would like you to believe that everyday, ‘man must be on the block’ in order for the provided information of 2+2=4-1=3 to be categorized as quick maths. This is actually a huge misconception; the provided equation can be categorized, along with many other mathematical expressions, as quick maths, regardless of how much ‘man is on the block’.

It’s also good to note that the truthfulness of a statement does not necessarily correlate with how quick the maths is. Any mathematical equation or expression can be classified as quick maths, as long as the expression is a part of a procedure intended to solve a mathematical problem in a swift and efficient manner. This is assuming that the definition for mathematics also encompasses processes where a mistake could be present, thereby possibly resulting in statement that may not be necessarily true under the assumed set of axioms.

-rep can’t cook chicken pesto properly

+rep I'm now an official body buildier just off how heavy he is to carry