31
已評論
產品
393
帳戶內
產品

Draconas 最近的評論

< 1  2  3  4 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 31 項
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 217.3 小時 (評論時已進行 92.0 小時)
sony thought that messing with people that play a game based on teamwork would be a good idea

sony learned it's not a good idea
張貼於 2024 年 5 月 3 日。 最後編輯於 2024 年 5 月 6 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 2,704.8 小時 (評論時已進行 65.9 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
despite my issues with some people, they're trying and I can appreciate it
張貼於 2023 年 10 月 6 日。 最後編輯於 2024 年 5 月 25 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 36.1 小時 (評論時已進行 35.1 小時)
for a bethesda game it honestly could be worse, it's not no man sky, it's not star citizen, elite dangerous, etc.
IMO least buggy bethesda game as well, only encountering about 3 non gamebreaking ones in 35 hours.

maybe wait for a price drop as $70 is a bit too high of an asking price.
張貼於 2023 年 9 月 9 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
26 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 1.2 小時
paradox of hope did not infringe on your IP
paradox of hope did not use any of your assets
paradox of hope was made by one guy, worked on four years, and was said guys only income

yet you send a cease and desist knowing damn well knowing NiKZ can't contest it

and you have a sale mere days later just to spit in his face further

I cannot in good faith recommend metro to others in the future

bunch of jackasses
張貼於 2023 年 8 月 27 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 10.4 小時
rest in peace bit.

had a fun time playing this and for the low price, I encourage you to play it
張貼於 2023 年 5 月 15 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 1,638.1 小時 (評論時已進行 1,630.1 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
great platform ruined by the asinine greed of karel who wanted to shoe horn crypto into it and blamed everyone else when his pump and dump killed the platform

edit: after preventing some people from logging in for a few hours, he reset our storage quote to 1GB https://i.imgur.com/0WZcbdz.png
張貼於 2023 年 5 月 5 日。 最後編輯於 2023 年 9 月 26 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 26.9 小時 (評論時已進行 24.8 小時)
my only real complaint about this is durability on tools being like half dead after 3 uses
張貼於 2022 年 12 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 0.0 小時
it's alright, new game play mechanic introduced in the series that I don't think a mod ever really done either.
im a bit let down it's limited to only fertilizing and not like, any liquid however.

but still, for its price, worth a try
張貼於 2022 年 10 月 16 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 13.4 小時 (評論時已進行 9.2 小時)
you whack blocks with light sabers to the beat of a song, what's there not to like?
張貼於 2022 年 8 月 2 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
2
1
總時數 564.5 小時 (評論時已進行 564.2 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
EAC and the removal of mods wasn't enough? you now want to record people even in private and record their eye movements and body tracking data? you're planning to put pay walls for content now, take 50% of a creators profits if they use your market place?

even better, you perma-ban people at random, don't ever explain why, and you violate EU law by refusing to provide or delete user data when requested if they're banned.

why do people seriously use a platform that only sees you as a number and treats you horribly? use alternative platforms please people, we're watching an exodus of twitter to bluesky why is it apparently impossible for vrchat users?

resonite exists, give it a try for a month and you'll be seeing how very limiting vrchat is and wonder why people are using it. you can create build and import literally just about anything you can think of in resonite, on here they're wanting to charge you to use a video player, why are you letting vrc devs walk all over you? do better
張貼於 2022 年 7 月 25 日。 最後編輯於 2023 年 12 月 5 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1  2  3  4 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 31 項