Recent reviews by Jursa

Cheater's Haven

Rating: ★☆☆☆☆

Call Of Duty showcases its potential as a thrilling and competitive experience, offering a range of ranks for players to aspire to. However, this potential quickly crumbles as you approach the upper echelons of the game's ranking system, namely Diamond and Crimson ranks. It's at this point that the curtain is drawn back, revealing an alarming and disheartening reality: cheating runs rampant, and it's here to stay.

The game's anti-cheat system, touted as a guardian against dishonest players, falls laughably short of its promise. It's as though the developers handed cheaters the keys to the kingdom, with little to no repercussions for their actions. The result? An utterly demoralizing experience where the line between legitimate and illegitimate players blurs into oblivion.

As you climb the ranks, you'll soon realize that every other game pits you against cheaters who flaunt their unfair advantages with reckless abandon. The sense of accomplishment one should feel when achieving a high rank is overshadowed by the sheer frustration of encountering cheaters at every turn.

What's more disheartening is the revelation that even some of the game's top 250 players and content creators are tainted by the stain of cheating. This not only erodes the integrity of the competitive scene but also undermines the trust that players place in the community's leaders.

One might hope that the developers would take swift and decisive action to address this crisis. Alas, hope is in short supply here. The only tangible effort they seem to have made is the implementation of a "shadow ban" system. However, calling this system broken would be a gross understatement. It's a convoluted, haphazard attempt at reining in cheaters, and its results are often arbitrary and infuriating.

In the end, Call Of Duty is a cautionary tale of a promising game's descent into chaos, with cheaters running amok and an impotent anti-cheat system doing little to deter them. The experience is marred by a ceaseless barrage of unfair encounters, ultimately driving players away in droves.

Avoid this title like the plague unless you have an inexplicable fondness for the torment of perpetual cheaters, shattered dreams, and broken promises. In a world filled with gaming options, Call Of Duty stands as a testament to how neglecting a cheating problem can turn a once-thriving community into a wasteland of frustration and despair.

Cheater's Haven

Rating: ★☆☆☆☆

Call Of Duty showcases its potential as a thrilling and competitive experience, offering a range of ranks for players to aspire to. However, this potential quickly crumbles as you approach the upper echelons of the game's ranking system, namely Diamond and Crimson ranks. It's at this point that the curtain is drawn back, revealing an alarming and disheartening reality: cheating runs rampant, and it's here to stay.

The game's anti-cheat system, touted as a guardian against dishonest players, falls laughably short of its promise. It's as though the developers handed cheaters the keys to the kingdom, with little to no repercussions for their actions. The result? An utterly demoralizing experience where the line between legitimate and illegitimate players blurs into oblivion.

As you climb the ranks, you'll soon realize that every other game pits you against cheaters who flaunt their unfair advantages with reckless abandon. The sense of accomplishment one should feel when achieving a high rank is overshadowed by the sheer frustration of encountering cheaters at every turn.

What's more disheartening is the revelation that even some of the game's top 250 players and content creators are tainted by the stain of cheating. This not only erodes the integrity of the competitive scene but also undermines the trust that players place in the community's leaders.

One might hope that the developers would take swift and decisive action to address this crisis. Alas, hope is in short supply here. The only tangible effort they seem to have made is the implementation of a "shadow ban" system. However, calling this system broken would be a gross understatement. It's a convoluted, haphazard attempt at reining in cheaters, and its results are often arbitrary and infuriating.

In the end, Call Of Duty is a cautionary tale of a promising game's descent into chaos, with cheaters running amok and an impotent anti-cheat system doing little to deter them. The experience is marred by a ceaseless barrage of unfair encounters, ultimately driving players away in droves.

Avoid this title like the plague unless you have an inexplicable fondness for the torment of perpetual cheaters, shattered dreams, and broken promises. In a world filled with gaming options, Call Of Duty stands as a testament to how neglecting a cheating problem can turn a once-thriving community into a wasteland of frustration and despair.

TRY IT YOURSELF FIRST

This game in my opinion is good! Not the best game, nor the worst. MMO standards good is a postive thing and reflects a bright future if things are done correctly. This game offers MANY things most mmo's do and more with great PVP concepts aswell. So far i'm satisfied and currently enjoying all i've done.

As of the 28th you could buy this game for early access for a small fee of $10 extra, a total of $40 unless you wanted the exspensive packs for some reason. So, lots of people massively logging in the game at the same time BEFORE the actual launch (Early Access 2Days Prior) caused and revealed some issues which have been fixed or are being worked on. Which is exspected nobodys perfect, but was needed to fine tune and have a proper ready game for actual release on the 30th. This is thousands and thousands of people from all over the world going on your game.. only so much you can test, until the actual moment.. and after fix were its needed.

This all being said there's too many self entitled little cry babies soley judging the game upon this early access which is absurd. The steam community is absolutely terrible when it comes reviews and its quite sad. I've literally seen bad reviews because people couldnt launch a game on steam or they got a blue screen.. come to find out those idiots didnt even buy the game yet or simply didnt adjust there cable into there monitor.. Yes, this is the community they'll hate for any reason and yes they're never wrong.. smh..

IF THERE'S ANY REVIEW YOU LISTEN TOO, LISTEN TO THE BIAS ONES AND TRY IT YOURSELF FIRST.
2hour window game time, for a free refund for any game on steam.

Radical Heights is EARLY ACCESS. That being said it has lots of things to fix still. For starters when you first start up, some may have a green screen and some may not. Simply put your game into windows mode in settings. This game has great potential of becoming a fairly great game once polished, if they do infact LISTEN TO THE COMMUNITY. They also need to seperate them selves more and add an actual normal respawn mode/ other game types such like CTF etc.. Getting a respawn where you can practice the game more and enjoy not worrying about that one death is a HUGE bonus that any BR game can add. Also the announcer is loud.. we should have more control on volume.. I look forward to future updates on this game.

P.s most bad reviews are from types of people who start a game up and see a small defect and cry about it cause its not finished like Far Cry 5.

If you are coming from a game like H1Z1 and enjoy the battle royale it offers.. then what i can say is you'll love this game and for what it provides. Battle Royale focused, including unique perks, and killing methods. Definitely recommend this game, how can i not at such a great price!