安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
管理員 
question? Do you think the word defendant is a term that
is governed by Federal law or State law?
Supposing the State had a statute that said, a
person becomes a defendant as soon as he -- one State has
a statute that says a person is a defendant when the
complaint is filed. Another State has a statute that says
a person is not a defendant until he's served with
process.
MS. SMITH: I think it is an issue -- for 1446
purposes and for removal purposes it is an issue of
Federal law, who is a defendant under Federal law.
QUESTION: So that even if a State had a statute
that said, you are a defendant when the complaint is
filed, that would not be controlling --
MS. SMITH: I think that's --
QUESTION: -- and I suppose your opponent would
make the same answer with respect to the other statute.